No government should be allowed to make decisions of life and death in medical decisions. That's Socialism.
I agree with the statement, but that's dictatorship - Nazis are just as guilty of it as Communists.
as of october 2020, if you were governor or president how would you handle this pandemic?
?.
No government should be allowed to make decisions of life and death in medical decisions. That's Socialism.
I agree with the statement, but that's dictatorship - Nazis are just as guilty of it as Communists.
hey oldsters, remember the tv series from the sixties?
david janssen was born to play that part.
i was 7 when it first aired.
I too remember it well. It was one of those shows that was always talked about the next day at school. They've been re-running it on the 'CBS Justice' channel (39) here in the UK for some time, along with the original Mission Impossible series.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-says-he-and-first-lady-have-tested-positive-for-coronavirus/ar-bb19cg4u?li=bbnb7kz.
given his age and weight, he is at very high risk of needing to be hospitalized.. trump is arguably the most well-protected man on earth, and he got it.. people.....wear a fruggin' mask!.
This is not the full clip, it's missing the important piece preceding it
There is nothing in what preceded his statements that would indicate that in his reference to disinfectant and injection, he meant injecting light. If he did, why didn't he say so the next day instead of appealing to "being sarcastic". It's the same old story, anything not complimentary to Trump is labelled fake news, anyone mentioning his gaffs is labelled mentally ill (TDS).
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-says-he-and-first-lady-have-tested-positive-for-coronavirus/ar-bb19cg4u?li=bbnb7kz.
given his age and weight, he is at very high risk of needing to be hospitalized.. trump is arguably the most well-protected man on earth, and he got it.. people.....wear a fruggin' mask!.
He was clearly talking about a device that disinfected by using light
What absolute bollocks. Even Trump himself didn’t claim he was referring to light with his ‘injecting disinfectant’ suggestion – the next day he claimed he was being sarcastic to the journalists. You initially put this down to the lying media, but now it appears you have found a new way to interpret Trump’s ridiculous suggestion. Here’s the transcript for anyone who’s interested – is it ‘clear’ to you that he was talking about injecting a device that disinfected by using light?
“Supposing we hit the body, with a tremendous er, whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light. And I think you said that hasn't been checked, but you're gonna test it? And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body - which you can do - either through the skin or, er, in some other way. And I think you said you're gonna test that too? Sounds interesting. Right, and then I see the disinfectant - where it knocks it out, in a minute, one minute, and is there a way we can do something like that? er by injection inside or, or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets on the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it'd be interesting to check that so that you're gonna have to use medical doctors right, but it sounds, it sound interesting to me. So we'll see. But the whole concept of the light, the way it goes in one minute, that's pretty powerful.”
in a disgusting new video, anthony morris iii talks about apostates, and brings to mind his 'hot dog' talk all over again as he anticipates the demise of ex-jehovah's witnesses.
i don't know if you're familiar with maggots, but when you see a whole bunch of them it's not a pleasant sight.. .
what a fitting picture of the final end of all of god's enemies.
Give the poor guy a break fellers, he’s only following the example of his loving god:
"the Lord our God delivered him over to us and we struck him down, together with his sons and his whole army. At that time we took all his towns and completely destroyed them - men, women and children. We left no survivors." (Deut 2:33-34).
"So the Lord our God also gave into our hands Og king of Bashan and all his army. We struck them down, leaving no survivors. At that time we took all his cities ... We completely destroyed them … destroying every city - men, women and children." (Deut 3:3-6).
“You must destroy all the peoples the Lord your God gives over to you. Do not look on them with pity” (Deut 7:16).
the truth that leads to eternal life at a church rummage sale.
1968 printing and a 74 printing of god's eternal purpose now triumphing for mens good.
i know the truth book has some things in it that are a bit damning.
Just a minor point Balaamsass, but the Truth book chapter you refer to is a statement not a question. It’s not, ‘Why is it?’, but rather, ‘Why it is”. Of course it is not wise for a JW to examine their own religion, just another example of JW double standards.
so i was observing an online conversation between a jw and a former-jw.
the non-jw pointed out that wwi cant have had anything to do with satan supposedly being "cast out of heaven" because wwi was already well under way in oct 1914.. the jw proceeds to explain that satan was actually thrown down to the earth in 1915 and that he started to wreak havock on the earth from heaven knowing he was about to be cast out.. so 1914 is officially old light now?
does anyone have a source for that or was this brother lying through his teeth?.
So, when it became clear to him that Jesus would be enthroned and there was nothing he could do about it, he began his campaign of worldwide destruction.
The naivety of it all! Like Satan thought he stood any chance of thwarting the almighty God? He knew there was nothing he could do about it in the garden of Eden. They portray these individuals like they have all the acumen of human beings, but then that’s exactly what you would expect from a bunch of fairy tales made up by primitive people over 3,000 years ago. I still find it hard to believe that I ever swallowed all that bullshit.
the most powerful love in the universe is unconditional love.. a love that has no requirements or conditions.
no actions are necessary to receive it.. this love is all around us and can be easily seen.
watch any mother with its new born baby.
Unconditional love is unhealthy.
Exactly, and it can also be dangerous. The Kray twin’s mother had such a love, and thus supported her sons no matter what evil they got up to.
the most powerful love in the universe is unconditional love.. a love that has no requirements or conditions.
no actions are necessary to receive it.. this love is all around us and can be easily seen.
watch any mother with its new born baby.
We impose conditions upon contact or whatever, but the love, if real is still there. Just as the love for a person who has died is still there, even though the person is not
Up to a point - if my son turned into a child killing paedophile I would still have the “unconditional love” that I had for him before he turned, just as in your example of a dead relative. But I would not love him now – how could I? I couldn’t love any child killing paedophile, so why should my son be any different just because he’s my son. (He’s not by the way, and I love him now as much as ever).
the most powerful love in the universe is unconditional love.. a love that has no requirements or conditions.
no actions are necessary to receive it.. this love is all around us and can be easily seen.
watch any mother with its new born baby.
if what some call Love is "conditional", it is not really Love at all
I find this concept rather confusing. Parental love is probably the closest you can get to unconditional love, but should it be truly unconditional? If my son turned out to be a murdering pedophile, should my love continue to protect him? If he turned into another Hitler, Stalin or Pol Pot, should I still love him? Could I even? I don’t think I could. It seems to me that love is always conditional. Conditional on the object of our love remaining a decent human being.